Engineering

Security is part of the build, not a review at the end

The six security habits we bake into every project from the first commit.

Written by
Imran Qureshi, DevOps Engineer
Published
Reading time
5 minutes

A security review at the end of a project finds problems at the most expensive possible moment: when the design is fixed, the deadline is close and every fix means rework. So we don't treat security as a phase. It is a set of habits that start with the first commit.

Access is modelled per record

Permissions are designed into the data model, not bolted onto screens. If a user shouldn't see a record, the API won't return it, whatever the interface does.

Security isn't a phase. It's a set of habits that start with the first commit.

Everything is encrypted, everywhere

In transit and at rest, with managed key rotation. It is a default in our project templates, not a ticket someone has to remember.

Every change is attributed

Audit logging records who did what and when, and it is queryable. The question “who changed this?” should take seconds to answer.

Backups are tested, not assumed

Automated backups only count if a restore has actually been rehearsed. We schedule restore drills, and we write down how long they took.

Dependencies are watched

Automated scanning flags vulnerable packages, and we keep a patch cadence. Most real-world breaches start with a known, unpatched dependency.

Environments stay separate

Development, staging and production are isolated, and production data does not leak into the others. It is the simplest rule on this list and the one most often broken.

Start a project

Got a problem software could solve?

Tell us what's slow or messy at your business. We'll reply within one working day and tell you honestly whether software can help.